quinta-feira, novembro 29, 2012
terça-feira, novembro 27, 2012
Por que estou com Israel?
Por que estou com Israel?
Eu não sou judeu, mas estou com Israel porque sou a favor da democracia, da liberdade e da paz. O que está é jogo pode afetar a vida de todos. Israel é uma das poucas reservas democráticas do mundo. O Hamas não quer paz. Não se trata de uma disputa de terras. Eles querem simplesmente destruir Israel como afirmou Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, em julho de 2012:
Eu não sou judeu, mas estou com Israel porque sou a favor da democracia, da liberdade e da paz. O que está é jogo pode afetar a vida de todos. Israel é uma das poucas reservas democráticas do mundo. O Hamas não quer paz. Não se trata de uma disputa de terras. Eles querem simplesmente destruir Israel como afirmou Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, em julho de 2012:
“Israel deve ser destruído”. “O Islã é uma religião universal e Deus não enviou nenhuma outra religião. Deus não enviou qualquer religião chamada cristianismo ou judaísmo. Abraão foi pregador do Islã, e assim era Moisés e Jesus”, “Deus enviou uma religião que é o Islã. Nosso amado profeta pertence a todos e ele é o último de todos os profetas. Ele também é o profeta dos americanos, europeus e asiáticos. Ele é o profeta dos budistas e veio para salvar todos!”
Do discurso à prática
Recentemente, o Irã confirmou ajuda militar a grupos terroristas de Gaza.
Clique aqui para saber mais.
segunda-feira, novembro 26, 2012
domingo, novembro 25, 2012
sexta-feira, novembro 23, 2012
quinta-feira, novembro 22, 2012
Thanksgiving Day
Thanksgiving and Hanukkah: Celebrating Religious Freedom
Thanksgiving in the United States is the quintessential
American holiday. The smells of the turkey cooking in the oven, cranberry
sauce, pumpkin pie and apple pie fill American homes as families gather to be
thankful and celebrate. For many watching the NFL Football game at the end of
the day is what finding the Afikoman is to Passover. There are other more
tangible connections between Thanksgiving and Judaism.
The pilgrims -- authors of the Mayflower Compact in November
1620, where they declared, "Having undertaken, for the Glory of God, and
advancements of the Christian faith" -- were guided by a very strong
religious fervor and faith who saw themselves as establishing a New Israel.
They read their Bible and many scholars point to the Sukkot, the Jewish fall
harvest holiday, as being a basis for Thanksgiving.
We also know that Sukkot is the original basis why Hanukkah
is celebrated for eight days. And that fact raises an interesting point. Both
Thanksgiving and Sukkot, in this day and age, are celebrated as holidays of
religious freedom when that was neither their original intent nor completely
historically accurate. The earliest Jewish sources (II Macabees) explain that
Hanukkah was an eight-day holiday being a late celebration of Sukkot since,
"during Sukkot they had been wandering in the mountains and caverns like
wild animals." Sukkot was also an appropriate basis for Hanukkah since
Sukkot was the holiday when the King Solomon dedicated the First Temple. The
story of the miracle of the oil does not appear until much later during the
Talmudic period because the rabbis had an ax to grind against the Hasmoneans
who combined both being kings and priests, and because of their corruption and
infighting eventually led to the Romans conquest and the destruction of the
Second Temple and the end of Jewish sovereignty until 1948. In all of these
explanations of the origins of Hanukkah the freedom of Jews to celebrate our
religion is paramount.
Thanksgiving is also celebrated as a holiday of religious
freedom. The Puritans left England, first via Holland, having been persecuted
in England for their religious beliefs. They established the Plymouth Colony to
be able to celebrate their form of Christianity as they understood it and
celebrated their first Thanksgiving in November of 1621. But they were not
advocates of religious freedom for others; they were believers in a theocratic
intolerant community. Fortunately for America, and the world, it was not the
narrow minded Puritans of Plymouth that won the day, but a different Puritan
who made a break with them whose thinking would prevail. Roger Williams arrived
in Plymouth in 1631 with his ideas of separation of house of worship and state
along with freedom of religion. By 1635 he was banished from the Massachusetts
Bay Colony for these heretical beliefs and fled to present day Rhode Island
where we was welcomed by the Narragansett Native Americans. There from lands he
bought from them he established Providence since he believed that God's
providence had led him there. As the colonies formed into a nation over the ensuing
century and a half it was the voice of Roger Williams as seen in the writings
of Jefferson and others that became the true vision and aim of the United
States of America.
And this brings us back to the story of Hannukah. While the
Maccabees were fighting for freedom from Greek occupation and oppression they
were not fighting for religious freedom for all. In fact they were also
involved in a civil was with the Hellenized Jews of their day. Like the
Puritans who landed at Plymouth Rock, the Maccabees had a very narrow view of
who and what they would accept when it came to religion; neither believed in a
pluralistic approach to religion. And yet we celebrate both Thanksgiving and
Hanukkah as holidays of religious freedom.
One could say that we have created a false myth about both
holidays. Myths may not be literally true, but they are one of the vehicles
where societies safeguard their values. In the case of the observance of
Thanksgiving and Hanukkah in the United States, we decided that religious freedom
is something we hold sacred and have chosen to celebrate through both of these
holidays. And for that we can be thankful.
This piece first appeared in Jerusalem Post on Nov. 21, 2012.
I stand with Israel
Five things I never want to hear again about the conflict in
Gaza
1. “On the one
hand, I oppose the missile attacks by Hamas on Israel. On the other
hand…”
There is no “other hand." Opposition to rocket
fire on innocent civilians in Israel must be unequivocal and absolute. No
more excuses and rationalizations. Every single missile firing from Gaza
is intended to kill and terrorize the innocent and is a war crime. Civilized
people do not look for ways to justify these attacks, even by implication.
2. “I don’t know
what Israel should do, but I do know that this war will accomplish nothing.”
The missile fire has continued for 11 years. During
that time, other countries and the United Nations have mostly been
silent. Military action at this point is, in fact, a necessary response,
and this much is certain: Israel not does not need and will not accept
advice from those who shrug their shoulders and say “I have no idea what should
be done and anyway, probably nothing will work.”
3. “It’s
acceptable to use force, but Israel has used disproportionate force.”
What this almost always means is that if only more Jews had
been killed, we would be more understanding. It is almost as if
they were wishing for more Jewish deaths. This statement is usually
accompanied by the observation that in the recent fighting “only” 3 Israelis
have been killed, and only a small number over the last decade. But for
those who say this, the fact that a million people have had their lives
disrupted for years, every school requires a bomb shelter, children have been
traumatized to an almost unimaginable degree, and normal life has simply come
to a standstill is somehow not enough of a reason to take vigorous
action.
4. “The Hamas
missiles are not missiles, but inaccurate homemade contraptions.”
What difference could this possibly make? These
“contraptions” sow fear, cause chaos, force the population into shelters, and
must be treated in Israel as if they were more advanced weapons—because, of
course, in any given instance they could be.
5. “Israel, the
major military power in the region, could never be defeated militarily by
Hamas.”
I used to believe this, but I must admit, with great regret,
that I am no longer certain. It is absolutely true that Israel could not
be defeated in a conventional war by Hamas. But a prolonged campaign of
missile fire could, eventually, force citizens of the south to flee the area,
demoralize Israelis everywhere, discourage investment from abroad, undermine
Israel’s deterrence, and encourage Arab governments to adopt a rejectionist
course. And all of this is a reason why, after so many years of
unrelenting attacks, Israel must do what is necessary to put an end to rocket
fire into her territory.
I do not know what will be in the days and weeks
ahead. American involvement may create possibilities for political
progress, and even now, approaches must be made to the voices of relative moderation
in the Arab world. But if a peace is to be created, it must be built on
the truth about Gaza, and the truth is this: Hamas is the guilty party,
and there is no reason to tolerate the lies and deceptions of those who say
otherwise.
Assinar:
Postagens (Atom)